Solutions
PR CitationPlacements on 500+ scored crypto outlets AI actually cites AI CitationTrack how 5 AI engines cite you. 100-point audit, weights published ContentCitation-engineered articles. Humanized, fact-checked, tracked
Resources
LearnWhat AEO is and how AI search works for crypto, from scratch MethodologyEvery weight and formula behind the score, in the open Case studiesMeasured client results. Dated, reproducible, no vanity metrics ComparisonsciteOS vs Profound, Coinbound, and Cision, honestly ?FAQHow crypto citations work across AI and PR
More
Pricing Sign in Get my audit →
Compare/AthenaHQ
Compare · 06 / 06 / updated June 2026

citeOS vs AthenaHQ

AthenaHQ is fast, well-funded, and built to get any startup a GEO read in a couple of minutes. That speed is real and it's a strength. The question is what happens after the scan, and whether the read understands crypto. That's where citeOS goes a different direction. If you're after an AthenaHQ alternative for a crypto brand, this is it.

The short version / 01

The AthenaHQ alternative that answers "then what?"

AthenaHQ leans into speed and engine breadth, and for a generalist startup that's a sensible pitch. Two things matter more for a crypto team than raw engine count. First, does the tool actually understand your category, the difference between a DeFi answer and a payments answer, which outlets a crypto engine trusts. Second, once it finds the gap, who closes it. We chose to go narrow on crypto and deep on execution, instead of wide and hands-off.

Side by side / 02

The spec sheet, no spin.

citeOSby Emergence Media AthenaHQGEO platform
Starting price$0 free scan · $299 audit · $749/mo foundingsee pricingIntro plan around $95, scaling to roughly $295/mocredit-metered tiers
Built forCrypto teams, Web3 categories specificallyStartups and marketers, any industry
Free entry Public scan, no signup Fast free scan, signup-based
What's measuredOne score: AI citations + PR placements + contentGEO visibility across enginesmeasurement-first
Engine coverageThe 5 that matter for crypto: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Google AI ModeMarkets a broader engine count
Crypto outlet data 500+ ranked crypto outlets, scored No outlet database, no PR side
Execution layer We ship the fixes, the PR, and the content Recommendations, your team executes
SpeedScan in about a minute, full audit in 24–48h Very fast scan, a core selling point
Methodology Published weights, reproducibleProprietary scoring
Best-fit buyerWeb3 teams who want the gap closed, with PR attachedGeneralist startups wanting a quick GEO read across engines
The honest read / 03

Where each one actually wins.

If you're not in crypto, a couple of AthenaHQ's strengths probably outweigh ours. Here's the real split.

citeOS wins on

Crypto fluency and follow-through

  • The read knows your category. A general GEO score can't tell you that a stablecoin answer and a gaming-token answer pull from completely different sources. Ours is built to.
  • We close the loop. The audit is the start, not the deliverable. We ship coverage, content and technical fixes, then re-audit.
  • PR is part of the product. 500+ scored crypto outlets means we can act on a gap, not just flag it.
AthenaHQ wins on

Speed and general-purpose breadth

  • You want a read in two minutes, across many engines. If breadth and speed are the priority and you're industry-agnostic, that's their pitch and they deliver it.
  • You're a non-crypto startup. A generalist platform fits a generalist company better than a crypto-only engine would.
  • You have a team to execute. If you only need the recommendations and can run them in-house, you don't need our execution layer.
Where we agree

Get a baseline before you spend

  • Both of us let you scan free before committing a dollar.
  • Both treat AI visibility as something to measure, not guess at.
  • The difference is depth in one vertical plus execution, versus breadth across many.
Every claim on this page is scored on published criteria. Engine weights, signal math, all of it public.
ChatGPT .24Gemini .20Google AI Mode .20Perplexity .14Claude .11Entity coherence .11
See methodology →
Fair questions / 04

About this comparison

Is this sponsored or affiliated?+

No. No relationship with AthenaHQ and nothing earned if you choose them. We wrote it because buyers comparing the two asked us to.

Have you used AthenaHQ?+

We evaluated it the way a buyer would, including the free scan. Pricing and positioning here reflect what was public as of mid-2026, so check their site for current details.

When should I pick AthenaHQ over citeOS?+

If you want the fastest possible GEO read across a broad set of engines, you operate outside crypto, and you'll handle execution yourself, AthenaHQ is a strong choice. Pick citeOS when you're a crypto team that wants depth in the vertical and the work done for you.

Where do your numbers come from?+

Our published scoring system: 20 buyer-style prompts × 5 engines = 100 observation points per audit, across 500+ ranked crypto outlets. The methodology is public.

Get the crypto-native read. Free.

Scan your brand across all five engines and see where the crypto answers go instead of to you. No card, no signup, about a minute.

Scan my brand free →
citeOS