Solutions
PR CitationPlacements on 500+ scored crypto outlets AI actually cites AI CitationTrack how 5 AI engines cite you. 100-point audit, weights published ContentCitation-engineered articles. Humanized, fact-checked, tracked
Resources
LearnWhat AEO is and how AI search works for crypto, from scratch MethodologyEvery weight and formula behind the score, in the open Case studiesMeasured client results. Dated, reproducible, no vanity metrics ComparisonsciteOS vs Profound, Coinbound, and Cision, honestly ?FAQHow crypto citations work across AI and PR
More
Pricing Sign in Get my audit →
Compare/Peec AI
Compare · 04 / 06 / updated June 2026

citeOS vs Peec AI

Peec is one of the cleaner AI-search analytics products out there, and it's built for marketing teams in any industry. We built citeOS for one industry on purpose: crypto. And we don't stop at the dashboard. Here's the honest read, including the cases where Peec is the smarter buy. If you're weighing a Peec AI alternative for a crypto brand, this is the honest read.

The short version / 01

Looking for a Peec AI alternative for crypto? The vertical matters.

Peec answers "how visible are we across AI search?" for a general marketing audience, and it answers it well. The question we kept hearing from Web3 founders was narrower and harder: when someone asks ChatGPT for the best exchange or the safest L2 bridge, are we in the answer, who's beating us, and what do we do about it this week. A horizontal tool can show you the gap. It won't write the CoinDesk pitch or fix your llms.txt. That's the line this page is about.

Side by side / 02

The spec sheet, no spin.

citeOSby Emergence Media Peec AIAI search analytics
Starting price$0 free scan · $299 audit · $749/mo foundingno card for the scan · see pricingAround $95/mo, 7-day trialcard-free trial, then a monthly plan
Built forCrypto teams, Web3 categories specificallyMarketing teams, any industry
Free entry Public scan, no signup Trial requires a signup, no public audit
What's measuredOne score: AI citations + PR placements + content, tied togetherAI-search visibility and share of voiceanalytics-first
Engine coverageChatGPT · Perplexity · Gemini · Claude · Google AI ModeMajor engines, with per-engine tracking views
Crypto outlet data 500+ ranked crypto outlets, scored No outlet database, no PR side
Execution layer We ship the fixes, the PR, and the content Analytics and alerts, your team executes
Methodology Published weights, reproducibleProprietary scoring
SeatsNo per-seat pricingGenerous seats, agency-friendly plans
Best-fit buyerWeb3 teams who want the work done, not just the chartMarketing teams wanting clean AI-search analytics across brands
The honest read / 03

Where each one actually wins.

I'd rather lose a deal than win one that ends in a refund. So here's where Peec is genuinely the better choice.

citeOS wins on

Crypto depth, plus the hands to fix it

  • The prompt set already speaks crypto. Our 20 buyer prompts and sector benchmarks are written for exchanges, DeFi, wallets and L1s, so the gaps you see are the ones your actual customers create.
  • We close the gap, you don't. When the audit finds you're missing from "best stablecoin wallet," we go get the coverage and write the page. Peec hands that part back to you.
  • There's a PR engine attached. 500+ crypto outlets, scored on what actually earns AI citations. That's the lever a pure analytics tool can't pull.
Peec wins on

Breadth, polish and self-serve

  • You're not only in crypto. If you market a SaaS product, a fintech and a consumer app, a vertical tool is the wrong shape. Peec covers any industry cleanly.
  • You want a tidy dashboard your whole team logs into. Peec's seats and UX are built for marketing orgs that want to self-serve, not hand the work to an agency.
  • You already have execution muscle. If you've got writers and a PR contact and just need the visibility data, paying for our execution layer is paying for something you don't need.
Where we agree

AI search is a number you can manage

  • Both of us track the major answer engines on a schedule, not by vibes.
  • Both treat "are we in the answer?" as a metric, not a guess.
  • The split is what happens after the chart. We act on it for you. Peec hands you a very good chart.
Every claim on this page is scored on published criteria. Engine weights, signal math, all of it public.
ChatGPT .24Gemini .20Google AI Mode .20Perplexity .14Claude .11Entity coherence .11
See methodology →
Fair questions / 04

About this comparison

Is this sponsored or affiliated?+

No. We have no relationship with Peec and earn nothing if you choose them. We wrote this because crypto teams kept asking us how the two compare before they bought.

Have you actually looked at Peec?+

Yes, as a buyer would: hands-on with the product, their public pricing, and conversations with people running it. It's a well-built tool. Pricing and positioning here reflect what was public as of mid-2026, so check their site for the current numbers.

When should I pick Peec over citeOS?+

If you're a multi-industry marketing team that wants self-serve AI-search analytics, generous seats, and you already have people to act on what you find, Peec is a clean fit. Come to us when the category is crypto and you'd rather the gap got closed than just measured.

Where do your numbers come from?+

Our published scoring system: 20 buyer-style prompts × 5 engines = 100 observation points per audit, across 500+ ranked crypto outlets. The methodology is public so you can check our math.

Don't take my word for it. Run the scan.

See exactly where the five engines cite you, and where they cite someone else, for your crypto category. No card, no signup, about a minute.

Scan my brand free →
citeOS